NAU Harvester System
IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPORTIONALITY PRINCIPLE IN ABORTION CRIMINALIZATION: BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS
Наукові журнали Національного Авіаційного Університету
View Archive Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPORTIONALITY PRINCIPLE IN ABORTION CRIMINALIZATION: BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS
РЕАЛІЗАЦІЯ ПРИНЦИПУ ПРОПОРЦІЙНОСТІ У КРИМІНАЛІЗАЦІЇ АБОРТУ: БАЛАНСУВАННЯ ПУБЛІЧНОГО ТА ПРИВАТНОГО ІНТЕРЕСІВ |
|
| Creator |
Шевченко, Сніжана Василівна; Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка
|
|
| Subject |
proportionality principle; balancing; public interest; private interest; abortion
— принцип пропорційності; балансування; публічний інтерес; приватний інтерес; аборт; штучне переривання вагітності 343.2/.7(045) |
|
| Description |
Objective: to analyze the implementation of proportionality principle as the principle of balancing of public and private interests in abortion criminalization. Research methods: analytical, axiological, comparative-legal and others. Results: it is identified and critically overviewed main approaches to determine public and private interests in abortion criminalization. Discussion: it is argued that no public interest in abortion criminalization can be justified in imposing disproportionate restrictions on privacy right of a woman or in creating conditions under which privacy right will be abused. Establishment of criminal responsibility for abortion is a reflection of particular outlook and its extrapolation into law. Abortion criminalization is ultimately nothing more than a choice of ideological solution to ethical dilemma of establishing a state restriction on access to abortion or a complete ban on abortion. Criminalization is the ultimate remedium power of state to regulate public relations which means that if certain relationships can be settled not by criminal measures but by any others which is less burdensome for human rights then the legislator must do so. Thus, it seems logical to conclude that within the framework of the classification approach, the individual components of the principle of proportionality are fragmented and detailed. This leads us to the conclusion that defining the principle of proportionality as an integral principle does not seem to be what is not expedient but impossible because of the formal laws of logic. Given this, let the author assert that it is the principle of proportionality that is the only fundamental basis of criminalization as a process and the subsystem of principles proposed by scientists it is not principles at all. It rather can be regarded as rules arising from the principle of proportionality. The state of research about the system of criminalization principles in the domestic doctrine of law is largely determined by the researches that were developed in the Soviet doctrine of law. Taking the above mentioned into consideration, the task of the modern criminal law doctrine is rethink critically the Soviet doctrine of law and to go beyond the boundaries of the "coordinate system" outlined by this doctrine in studies of this problem. The application of classification approach in criminal law researches on the implementation of the principles of criminalization in the process of establishing a specific criminal law prohibition seems not to be conservative but rather archaic. Giving due respect and honor to the research of previous generations of scientists in the criminal law doctrine, the author believe that this approach does not correspond to the new challenges and tasks that criminal law should be aimed to resolve, for instance, the effective protection of human rights.
Мета: проаналізувати реалізацію принципу пропорційності як принципу балансування публічного і приватного інтересів у криміналізації аборту. Методи дослідження: аналітичний, аксіологічний, порівняльно-правовий та інші. Результати: визначено основні підходи до розуміння публічного і приватного інтересів у криміналізації аборту та критично осмислено їх. Обговорення: аргументовано, що жоден публічний інтерес у криміналізації аборту не може слугувати виправданням для встановлення непропорційних обмежень права на приватність жінки чи створення таких умов, за яких воно буде знівельовано. |
|
| Publisher |
National Aviation University
|
|
| Contributor |
—
— |
|
| Date |
2020-04-10
|
|
| Type |
—
— — |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/UV/article/view/14561
10.18372/2307-9061.54.14561 |
|
| Source |
Наукові праці Національного авіаційного університету. Серія: Юридичний вісник «Повітряне і космічне право»; Том 1, № 54 (2020); 201-207
Scientific works of National Aviation University. Series: Law Journal "Air and Space Law"; Том 1, № 54 (2020); 201-207 Научные труды Национального авиационного университета. Серия: Юридический вестник "Воздушное и космическое право»; Том 1, № 54 (2020); 201-207 |
|
| Language |
uk
|
|